[Documents menu] Documents menu

Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 01:36:45 -0600 (CST)
From: Michael Eisenscher <meisenscher@igc.org>
Article: 84328
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Message-ID: <bulk.14827.19991211121531@chumbly.math.missouri.edu>

How the World Trade Organisation is shaping domestic policies in health care

By David Price, Allyson M. Pollock, and Jean Shaoul, The Lancet, Vol.354 no.9193, 27 November 1999

Health Policy and Health Services Research Unit, University College London, London, UK (D Price BSc); Social Welfare Research Unit, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne (D Price); Health Policy and Health Services Research Unit, University College London, London WC1H 9EZ (Prof A M Pollock FFPHM); and School of Accounting and Finance, University of Manchester, Manchester (J Shaoul PhD)

Correspondence to: Prof Allyson M Pollock (e-mail: allyson.pollock@ucl.ac.uk)


High up on the agenda of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is the privatisation of education, health, welfare, social housing and transport. The WTO’s aim is to extend the free market in the provision of traditional public services. Governments in Europe and the US link the expansion of trade in public services to economic success, and with the backing of powerful medico-pharmaceutical, insurance, and service corporations, the race is on to capture the share of gross domestic product that governments currently spend on public services. They will open domestic European services and domestic markets to global competition by government procurement agreements, dispute-settlement procedures, and the investment rules of global financial institutions. The UK has already set up the necessary mechanisms: the introduction of private-sector accounting rules to public services; the funding of public-sector investment via private-public partnerships or the private finance initiative; and the change to capitation funding streams, which allows the substitution of private for public funds and services. We explain the implications of these changes for European public-health-care systems and the threat they pose to universal coverage, solidarity through risk- pooling, equity, comprehensive care, and democratic accountability.