From Thu Apr 22 02:45:09 2004
Organization: South Movement
To: “” <>
From: Dave Muller <>
Mailing-List: list; contact
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:33:55 +1000
Subject: [southnews] Wolfowitz setup for Saddam in the 1993 WTC Bombing

Blaming Saddam

Newsweek, reprinted in diamondbackonline (University of Maryland student newspaper), 21 April 2004

How the Pentagon considered extending its controversial ‘enemy combatant’ label in a bid to prove links between Iraq and Al Qaeda

April 21—In the run-up to the war on Iraq, a top Pentagon official pushed a highly unorthodox plan to deploy one of the U.S. government's most controversial legal tactics—the designation of suspected terrorists as “enemy combatants” in hopes of finding new evidence of alleged connections between Saddam Hussein's regime and Al Qaeda, NEWSWEEK has learned.

The proposal, pressed by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, called for President George W. Bush to declare Ramzi Yousef, the convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, as an enemy combatant in the war on terror. This would have allowed Yousef to be transferred from his cell at the U.S. Bureau of Prison's “supermax” penitentiary in Florence, Colo., to a U.S. military installation.

Wolfowitz contended that U.S. military interrogators—unencumbered by the presence of Yousef's defense lawyer—might be able to get the inmate to confess what he and the lawyer have steadfastly denied: that he was actually an Iraqi intelligence agent dispatched by Saddam to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993 as revenge for the first Persian Gulf War.

The previously unreported Wolfowitz proposal—and the high-level consideration it got within the Justice Department—sheds new light on the Bush administration's willingness to expand its use of enemy-combatant declarations inside the United States beyond the three alleged terrorists, two of them American citizens, who have already been designated by the White House.

It also underscores the persistence with which Wolfowitz and his allies within the Pentagon pursued efforts to uncover evidence of links between Saddam's government and Al Qaeda—a key, and still disputed, element in the Bush administration's case for war. One principal reason for that persistence, sources say, was Wolfowitz's fascination with the conspiracy theories of academic Laurie Mylroie, who has argued in a series of books and magazine articles that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, along with virtually every other terrorist strike in the years since that have been commonly attributed to Al Qaeda.

A spokesman for Wolfowitz had no comment. An administration official familiar with the deputy Defense secretary's position told NEWSWEEK today that Wolfowitz “simply has asked repeatedly over the past two and a half years whether there were ways to use our custody of Ramzi Yousef to get information on his uncle, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, mastermind of the September 11 attacks and his two brothers, his cousins and other family members and friends—all of whom are known to be terrorists.”

President Bush has since acknowledged there is no evidence of any Iraqi involvement in September 11. But administration officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, continue to assert that there is abundant evidence of past Iraqi support for terrorism, including possibly the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

The Wolfowitz proposal involving Yousef was repeatedly pressed on top Justice Department officials, including Attorney General John Ashcroft and then Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson, in 2002, law-enforcement officials tell NEWSWEEK. At one point, the high-level discussions apparently prompted a top Bureau of Prisons official to make an unauthorized entry to Yousef's cell at Florence to sound out his willingness to talk—a move that prompted strong protests to the Justice Department from the bomber's lawyer, according to department officials and correspondence between the lawyer and Justice officials. (The official, G. L. Hershberger, a regional director of the Bureau of Prisons, told NEWSWEEK he could not comment on his dealings with Yousef.

In a Feb. 10, 2003, letter to Yousef's lawyer, he acknowledged he had visited Yousef “in a manner consistent with sound correctional management,” but stated: “I have never threatened to change your client's conditions of confinement based on whether he provides information to the United States.”)

The plan also stirred strong opposition from the FBI, whose top officials argued that the proposal‘like other Wolfowitz-inspired efforts to prove links between Iraq and Al Qaeda terrorism‘were a waste of time and effort, sources said. FBI officials, led by Pasquale J. Damuro, then the FBI's chief of counterterrorism and now assistant director in charge of the New York field office, contended the bureau had already exhaustively investigated the theory that Yousef was working for Iraqi intelligence—and found no evidence to support it. “We've already covered this,” Damuro said at one high-level Justice meeting. (A spokesman for Damuro said he did not recall making the comment.)

Still, the plan was forwarded to the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, which under White House-directed procedures, is supposed to review candidates for enemy-combatant status, sources said. The office quickly concluded that Yousef didn't meet the standards and never forwarded a proposed designation to the White House. “We talked it to death,” said one lawyer involved in the discussions.

How the Government Hatched a Policy to Deal With “Enemy Combatants”

President Bush's authority to declare U.S. citizens enemy combatants in the war on terrorism is due to be argued next week when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in separate cases involving Yaser Hamdi, a former Taliban fighter captured in Afghanistan, and Jose Padilla, a former Chicago gang member accused of plotting to set off a radiological “dirty bomb” in the nation's capital.

As reported in this week's NEWSWEEK, the concept of enemy combatants has been the subject of intense, sometimes acrimonious debates within the administration. Once an enemy-combatant designation is made, the detainee is transferred from the U.S. courts to the custody of the U.S. military and is stripped of virtually all constitutional protections, including the right to counsel and the right to trial. The administration has argued that, because the United States is “at war” with Al Qaeda and its allies, enemy combatants can be detained indefinitely—until the end of the conflict.

In addition to Hamdi and Padilla, the White House also last year designated a third man—Ali Al-Marri, a former Bradley University student from Qatar who was living in Peoria, Ill.—as an enemy combatant. But some officials within the administration, led by Cheney, have pushed for more designations, prompting vigorous opposition from Justice Department officials who have warned that the extraordinary tactic might not pass muster in the Supreme Court.

Wolfowitz's interest in the procedure, sources said, stemmed from his longstanding interest in the theories of Mylroie, a controversial academic and former fellow of the conservative American Enterprise Institute. Her 2001 book, “Study of Revenge: The First World Trade Center Attack and Saddam Hussen's War against America,” cites Wolfowitz in the acknowledgements for providing “crucial support” for the project. Others who merit expressions of gratitude in Myleroie's acknowledgements are three top aides to Cheney—chief of staff Lewis (Scooter) Libby and foreign-policy advisors John Hannah and David Wurmser—as well as Undersecretary of State John Bolton and Francis Brooke, a principal Washington lobbyist for the Iraqi National Congress.

At the heart of Mylroie's theory is her contention that, after the invasion of Kuwait in 1990, Iraqi intelligence agents arranged for Yousef to assume the identity of Abdul Basit, a Pakistani man who was then living in Kuwait, and dispatched him to the United States to commit acts of terrorism.