From firstname.lastname@example.org Thu Aug 10 13:38:22 2000
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:33:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Michael Eisenscher <email@example.com>
Subject: Best GOP VP Candidate Democrats Could Find?
Senator Often Stands to Right of His Party
By David E. Rosenbaum, The Record,
8 August 2000
WASHINGTON, Aug. 7 -- In his two terms in the Senate, Joseph I. Lieberman
has often taken positions at odds with Vice President Al Gore and important
constituencies of the Democratic Party on school vouchers, affirmative
action, regulation of managed care, capital gains taxes and product liability.
He has sided with the Clinton administration on all important budget votes,
and unlike many other Democrats he has supported the administration's
positions on trade and welfare.
Senator Lieberman's views are completely in tune with the vice president's
on abortion, the environment, gun control, gay rights and the death penalty.
On Social Security, a central point of conflict between Mr. Gore and Gov.
George W. Bush of Texas, Mr. Lieberman has suggested that he could support
allowing workers to invest a portion of their payroll taxes in the private
markets. That is Mr. Bush's position. But Mr. Lieberman has never been
faced with a vote on the matter and never made explicit what kind of
investments he would allow and in what circumstances.
He has usually supported the Clinton administration on foreign policy
issues, and in 1991, Mr. Lieberman and Mr. Gore, who was then a senator,
were among only 10 Democratic senators who voted to give President George
Bush the authority to use military force in the Persian Gulf.
When he has opposed the Clinton administration, Mr. Lieberman has
invariably taken a more conservative stance, often the one held by
For example, since he first entered the Senate, Mr. Lieberman has supported
and sponsored legislation establishing pilot programs in which the federal
government would give parents vouchers they could use to pay their
children's tuition at private schools, including those with religious
Mr. Gore has argued that such programs could undermine public schools.
Teachers' unions, which are important supporters of Democratic causes and
contributors to Democratic candidates, strenuously oppose vouchers. And
many Democrats believe that vouchers violate the doctrine of separation of
church and state.
Mainly because of Democratic opposition, no voucher plan has ever become law.
But in testimony in 1997 before a Senate committee about schools in the
District of Columbia, Mr. Lieberman declared: "There are some who dismiss
suggestions of school choice programs and charter schools out of hand,
direly predicting that these approaches will 'ruin' the public schools. The
undeniable reality here is that this system is already in ruins, and to
blindly reject new models and refuse to try new ideas is simply foolish. We
can and must do better for these children, and to cling stubbornly to the
failures of the past will just not get us there."
Similarly, Mr. Lieberman has been critical of programs that give special
breaks to blacks and other groups to make up for past discrimination. Mr.
Gore has been a strong supporter of affirmative action.
In a speech on the Senate floor in 1995, Mr. Lieberman said: "Affirmative
action is dividing us in ways its creators could never have intended
because most Americans who do support equal opportunity and are not biased
don't think it is fair to discriminate against some Americans as a way to
make up for historic discrimination against other Americans. For after all,
if you discriminate in favor of one group on the basis of race, you thereby
discriminate against another group on the basis of race."
On managed care, Mr. Lieberman was part of a bipartisan group that tried
last year to break a deadlock between the Clinton administration and
Republican senators over how to regulate health plans. The administration
maintained that the legislation Mr. Lieberman favored would have been too
generous to insurance companies. Consumer groups and labor unions were
among those siding with the administration.
In the early 1990's, when Democratic senators used a filibuster to block
the Bush administration's proposal for a cut in the capital gains tax,
Senator Lieberman opposed his party's leaders and voted with Republicans
against the filibuster and in favor of the tax cut.
Mr. Lieberman has also regularly voted for legislation to limit damages
that can be assessed in civil lawsuits. In doing so, he took on not just
the Clinton administration but also trial lawyers, who are among the
Democrats' biggest contributors.
Many of Mr. Lieberman's friends said he had no alternative but to take this
position because it was the one favored by the insurance industry. The
industry is important to Connecticut's economy and has generously donated
to Mr. Lieberman's campaigns over the years.
But that is not Mr. Lieberman's explanation for his stand. At a news
conference last year, he said the American system of civil law had "gone
way off track and become a lottery in which literally a few people do very
well but most of the people injured don't really get adequately compensated."
His vote in 1996 in favor of overhauling the welfare system lost him
friends among liberal Democrats. And his consistent support of
international trade measures like the North American Free Trade Agreement
and favorable trade relations with China runs against the views of
On the other hand, on other issues of primary importance to the unions like
increases in the minimum wage and prohibitions against employers' hiring
permanent replacements for striking workers, Mr. Lieberman has taken
Throughout his career in Congress, Mr. Lieberman has voted for proposals to
overhaul the campaign finance system. Most recently, he supported
legislation that would ban unregulated gifts to political parties, known as
soft money, a position also backed by Vice President Gore.
Republicans tried today to portray Mr. Lieberman as less than 100 percent
in favor of abortion rights. They produced a letter he wrote to a
constituent in 1989 suggesting that he favored a requirement that parents
of a minor be notified before an abortion could be performed.
But the organizations here that favor abortion rights said Mr. Lieberman
had never wavered in his votes on abortion, and the National Right to Life
Committee put out a statement criticizing Mr. Lieberman's record across the
On national security issues, Mr. Lieberman has regularly voted against
efforts to reduce the military budget and has supported submarines and
aircraft built at least in part by the many military contractors in
Connecticut. Until the Clinton administration took office, Mr. Lieberman
favored cutting funds for the Star Wars missile defense system, but
recently he was one of the first Democrats to endorse deployment of such a
system as soon as it was technologically realistic.
The one time he challenged the Clinton administration on a major foreign
policy matter was in 1995, when he and Bob Dole cosponsored legislation
requiring the president to break the United Nations embargo on sending arms
Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of
any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material
on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
You can subscribe to Solidarity4Ever by sending a message to:
Solidarity4Everfirstname.lastname@example.org and unsubscribe by sending an email to:
This is a read-only list, but if you have an item you want posted, send it to the list moderator at <email@example.com>, who will determine whether it is appropriate for redistribution. You can temporarily suspend delivery by sending a request to the same address. Notify the moderator at the time you want delivery resumed. You can also manage this function yourself by going to the list at <www.igc.topica.com/lists/Solidarity4Ever.